[ad_1]
Independent candidate RK Anand, who misplaced the Rajya Sabha election in Haryana final week within the midst of an ink row, as we speak filed a police criticism towards profitable candidate Subhash Chandra, a ruling BJP MLA and a few others alleging {that a} prison conspiracy was hatched that led to his defeat.
A lawyer, Anand, in his criticism to Chandigarh’s IGP, Tajender Singh Luthra, has leveled fees towards numerous individuals and demanded they be booked below numerous sections of the IPC and below the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
He filed the criticism towards the BJP backed profitable Independent candidate and media baron Chandra, BJP MLA from Ambala Aseem Goel, Independent MLA Jai Parkash and sure officers from the workplace of Returning Officer and different unknown individuals.
[related-post]
Watch Video: What’s making news
Claiming {that a} unsuitable pen was given to his supporting Congress MLAs in order that votes could be rejected, Anand has stated “that even approved brokers couldn’t distinguish the ink by way of bare eye. Otherwise they might have identified that reality to their MLAs. The inks weren’t pink or inexperienced and violet. Those have been violet and royal blue and each have been from sketchpens.
“The distinguishing shade of each was so slim that even skilled folks couldn’t spot the distinction.
“At the time of counting, only 4 ballots were identified by naked eyes. However, on repeated pointing out by Subhash Chandra and with the help of extra light, further ballots having different inks were identified. Subhash Chandra knew well before that there were 12 ballots with royal blue sketch pen,” Anand has alleged.
“It is a clear case of fraud played on Election Commission and on the Congress voters to mislead them to mark their ballot without knowing as to which is the original pen. They presumed that the pen on the table is the pen supplied by Returning Officer for marking on the ballot,” he acknowledged.
He stated all of the 12 voters whose votes bought canceled had marked their poll papers with one and the identical pen.
“All these voters have been duped to vote by the modified pen would even be obvious from the truth that all these poll papers had the choice markings by the identical pen. How one pen might be used for marking by all Congress MLAs except the identical pen is out there on the desk contained in the polling sales space.
“All these 12 voters had voted for me and had not marked any other preference,” he claimed.
[ad_2]