[ad_1]

JDU MP Kaushalendra Kumar from Bihar’s Nalanda has now raised the demand to ban ‘Bajrang Dal’ there too. Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, nevertheless, reacted to this and stated that he doesn’t have time to consider such issues, he’s busy with different issues. However, ever since Nitish’s alliance with the BJP has been damaged, he has been on a spree to undertaking himself as extra secular. There are frequent experiences of riots on spiritual festivals in Bihar and polarization within the society is intensifying. In such a state of affairs, it might be very troublesome to evaluate whether or not the impression of the Karnataka elections or the preparations for the upcoming Bihar elections is behind this demand of the JDU MP. 

Banning will not be an answer

Those who’re demanding to ban Bajrang Dal at this time, they had been with them a 12 months again. There are many sorts of ideologies in our nation, there are lots of sorts of folks, there are lots of sorts of characters, so who and what number of will you ban? If it’s a matter of banning, then there are casteist organizations, conservative concepts, ban them. Banning will not be an answer.

According to me group like Bajrang Dal has no position in at this time’s society, however demanding to ban it’s identical as actively working for Bajrang Dal. This might be as a result of some leaders tackle their voters every so often. This is just vote financial institution politics and therefore shouldn’t be supported.

Since JDU was with BJP until final 12 months, now once they have come away from NDA, they’re looking for new mass base. They know that the mass base is anti-BJP and Lalu Prasad already has affect there. So they assume that by saying all this they are going to enhance their votes, Muslims will vote for them. Now that vote financial institution which is anti-Modi vote financial institution is the vote of Grand Alliance and that is their inner battle. So that is why they’re telling Lalu Prasad that brother, we’re the brand new mullahs, we’ll eat extra onions. You used to disregard them, we discuss banning them. Otherwise, this can be a ridiculous demand. The Buddha who used to name God ‘Avyakrit’, used to say that brother, do not discuss him in any respect. If you discuss then there will probably be drawback. So, these sort of points are distracting the general public from the primary difficulty. Sometimes you get caste-wise census completed, typically you demand ban on Bajrang Dal, then all these aren’t the actual points. 

Nitish’s working type is excessive

The working type of Nitish ji, there have to be discuss on it. For instance, he banned alcohol. When you utterly deny one thing like this, you additionally create an undesirable attraction in direction of it. Like, the spirit of celibacy in our nation made folks extra oriented in direction of intercourse. This ‘denial’ is incorrect. You allegedly stopped ingesting, however the amount of alcohol additionally elevated and extra folks began dying. Nitish Kumar’s authorities has unfold liquor to each village. After that out of the blue banned. The conditions which have come to the fore now level in a unique course. Now suppose, you’ve gotten banned Bajrang Dal, then the kid who didn’t even know in regards to the village-rural or metropolis, may also begin asking about it.

There is a poem by the German author Bertolt Brecht. She tells {that a} revolutionary went to the jail and there he wrote the slogan on the wall of the jail. The jailer strongly disliked it, so he made him journey. Now that slogan has began shining. Then, the jailer stated to dig it up, so it was dug with a hammer and chisel and now it appeared utterly completely different – ​​lengthy dwell Lenin. 

So, we should always desist from this excessive strategy. Anyway, this factor is towards conscience that ban it, ban it. If there may be any extremist group, then methods should be discovered to cope with it. You will ban Bajrang Dal and rejoice in Haj Bhawan, then individuals are watching, not what you might be doing? If you construct Haj Bhavan, folks may also demand that Chhath Bhavan must be constructed subsequent to it.

Secularism needs to be understood. On the one hand, you might be impartial, alternatively, sporting a cap, you might be doing iftar with authorities cash. If you get Iftar social gathering organized at your own home with the cash out of your wage, then it’s okay. However, when you’ve gotten an Iftar social gathering on the authorities residence, will there be Satyanarayan Katha tomorrow, Ram Navami worship? If it occurs, then is that this the work of the federal government… This work shouldn’t be completed by the federal government. No one ought to assist such calls for.

Was Nitish proper in 1994, or in 2022?

When Nitish got here in 2005, he had some agenda. He did one thing for the Panchayats, thought. He thought for frequent faculty, fashioned a fee. A report got here underneath the management of Muchkund Dubey. The report of the Land Reforms Commission got here. After that they put the entire report in chilly storage. Leaving the whole lot in 2011, he fashioned the higher caste fee. What occurred to him?

Now they’re conducting caste-wise census, which was lastly banned by the Patna High Court. Be it Nitish or anybody else, he ought to to start with assume what must be our primary points? Bihar is a really backward state when it comes to training, well being and employment, so this must be our precedence. It was an excellent initiative by Tejashwi Yadav when he talked about 10 lakh jobs within the 2020 elections. Now it has been virtually a 12 months, when he’s the consultant of the most important social gathering, the federal government relies on him, Tejashwi is the Deputy Chief Minister and the federal government is working in accordance with his phrases, then the place is the matter of 10 lakhs? < /p>

A secular authorities is one which works by rising above the difficulty of gender and faith. That work will not be occurring. When Nitish rebelled towards Lalu in 1994, his argument was that the federal government can’t run underneath Lalu’s management, Bihar can’t progress. After that, after so a few years, they really feel that with out Lalu no work will probably be completed. So, now resolve whether or not he was proper in 1994 or is he proper in 2022. The points that Nitish had raised, he himself turned away from them. So, they need to think about themselves. Where has the report on frequent faculty system gone, the place has Muchkund Dubey’s report gone, then Nitish Kumar is of a divided thoughts, confused and he’s not capable of know what he’s attempting to do? Nitish ought to carry the folks of Bihar to the problems of actuality, they’ve been dwelling on emotional points for a few years.

(This article relies on private views)

[ad_2]