[ad_1]
New Delhi, January 29
Terming the Centre’s choice to ban a BBC documentary on the 2002 Gujarat riots as “mala fide, arbitrary and unconstitutional”, a Delhi-based advocate has moved the Supreme Court on the bottom that it violated the proper to free speech.
Petitioner ML Sharma requested the highest court docket to name and look at the BBC documentary and demanded motion towards these instantly and not directly concerned within the 2002 riots.
The PIL submitted that the BBC documentary had “recorded facts” which had been additionally “evidence” and could possibly be used to additional the reason for justice for victims.
Contending that the matter raised a constitutional query, the PIL urged the court docket to resolve if the residents have the proper beneath Article 19 (1) (2) to look at information, info and reviews on the 2002 Gujarat riots.
The petitioner sought quashing of the January 21 order of the Ministry of the Information and Broadcasting, terming it “illegal, mala fide, arbitrary and unconstitutional”.
[ad_2]